Research, not products. The technologies described on this page are exploratory research directions. None are commercially available or have received regulatory authorization in any jurisdiction. Some directions may become regulated medical devices in the future, subject to applicable approvals.
CORSMED RESEARCH

What we're working on next

Corsmed has spent over a decade building physics-based MRI simulations. We are now exploring how this foundation could enable a different kind of MRI: faster, quantitative, automated, and accessible.

This page describes the questions we are investigating. It is not a product roadmap.

How fast can MRI be?

Conventional MRI sessions take 15–45 minutes for conventional protocols, and considerably longer for whole-body imaging. We are investigating whether physics-based simulation approaches could meaningfully reduce acquisition time.

In early development testing on phantom data, we have observed that protocols capable of supporting synthetic reconstruction of multiple MRI contrasts can be acquired in approximately three minutes, compared with 30+ minutes for an equivalent conventional protocol.

We are also investigating whether comparable approaches could be extended to whole-body imaging within five minutes.

These results are from internal phantom testing and are not validated in clinical settings. Acceleration claims depend on which conventional sequences would otherwise be acquired, and have not been benchmarked against any specific clinical protocol.

Can we rethink the scanner itself?

Today's clinical MRI is dominated by closed-bore, high-field superconducting systems. These deliver excellent image quality but constrain access: claustrophobic patients, larger patients, mobility-limited patients, and pediatric patients are often poorly served. Many regions of the world lack any access at all.

We are investigating whether reconstruction-based approaches could relax the hardware constraints of MRI — potentially enabling open-architecture designs, lower field strengths, or otherwise more accessible scanner geometries — without sacrificing diagnostic image quality.

What if MRI were quantitative by default?

Most clinical MRI today produces images that are interpreted qualitatively. Two scans of the same patient on different scanners — or even the same scanner at different times — are difficult to compare numerically.

This limits MRI's role in tracking disease progression and treatment response over time.

We are investigating reconstruction approaches that could yield quantitative tissue characterizations as a routine output of clinical imaging, in a form that is robust across scanners and acquisitions.

Can MRI become a longitudinal instrument?

If MRI produced reliable quantitative outputs, comparable across time and across scanners, it could support longitudinal biomarker tracking: monitoring tissue properties as they change with disease, treatment, or aging.

We are investigating which tissue properties carry the most signal for which clinical questions, and whether reconstruction-based quantification is reproducible enough to support biomarker workflows.

What can computation contribute to radiology workflows?

Radiology workloads are growing faster than the radiology workforce. Computational tools, including machine learning–based ones, are increasingly being explored as workflow aids, ranging from automated reconstruction and quality control to flagging cases or regions for review.

Corsmed is investigating how the structured, physics-grounded outputs of reconstruction-based MRI might serve as better inputs to computational tools that automate routine technical steps and support, but do not replace, radiologist interpretation.

Research collaborations

We work with academic and clinical research groups exploring questions in MRI physics, reconstruction, and applications. If you are interested in research collaboration, get in touch.

Email our research team